Is Girishk safe?
Afghanistan · Asia · data updated 2026-09-04
Girishk is a city in Afghanistan, home to about 149k people, and one of 6,168 cities worldwide ranked on this site from published safety data. It currently ranks 4,687 of 6,168, with a safety score of 57.2 out of 100, which lands it in the middle band of the ranking.
Emergency 119 (police)
- US State Department: Do not travelOfficial travel advisory level 4 of 4 for Afghanistan, updated 2026-02-19.
- UK FCDO advises against all travel to this countryOfficial UK government travel advice, updated 2026-07-30.
- Same-sex activity criminalized - death penalty in lawLaw on the books in Afghanistan as of 2025 (OWID legal-status series) - enforcement varies, but LGBTQ+ travelers face legal risk.
No official source names specific areas to avoid here: travel advisories for Afghanistan are country-level, and no published dataset covers neighborhood-level crime - so this briefing does not invent it.
How safe is Girishk really?
No published homicide figure exists for Girishk itself, so the national rate stands in: Afghanistan recorded 4.2 homicides per 100,000 people in 2023 - close to the global city median. The city itself may be safer or more dangerous than its country's average.
Girishk also carries some conflict exposure: UCDP recorded 7 deaths from organized violence within 100 km across 3 events in 2022-2024 - a factor crime statistics alone would miss.
What the travel advisories say
The US State Department currently rates Afghanistan at level 4 of 4 - "Do not travel" (updated 2026-02-19). The UK Foreign Office advises against all travel to this country. Both advisories are country-level: no official source publishes verified neighborhood-level crime guidance for individual cities, which is why this page reports named areas only where an official source names them.
What to watch out for in Afghanistan
Terrorism in Afghanistan · Terrorist kidnap · Tour operators in Afghanistan · Protests · UK government support for detainees · Crime · Criminal kidnaps · Laws on dress · Lack of women’s rights · Ramadan · Illegal food, drugs and alcohol · Mobile phones, internet access and communications · Using cameras in secure areas · LGBT+ travellers · +6 more
Topic headings from the official UK FCDO travel advice for Afghanistan — country-level, not specific to Girishk. Read what each one says →
The numbers
- Homicide rate
- 4.2 /100knational rate, 2023
- Conflict deaths
- 7within 100 km, 2022-2024 (UCDP)
- Income inequality
- no datacountry,
- Human development
- HDI 0.496country, 2023
- Income
- $2,250/yrGNI per capita PPP · context only, not scored
- Population
- 149kurban centre · 10,623/km²
Country context for travelers
- Road deaths
- 15.9 /100kWHO, 2019 · often the biggest real travel risk
- Political stability
- 28/100World Bank WGI, 2024 · higher = more stable
- Rule of law
- 24/100World Bank WGI, 2024 · police and courts reliability
- Corruption perceptions
- 16/100Transparency International, 2025 · higher = cleaner
- Natural-hazard risk
- 7.8/10EU INFORM, 2026 · higher = riskier
- Women, Peace & Security
- 0.28Georgetown WPS Index, 2025 · 0-1, higher = better
- Air quality
- 37.9 µg/m³PM2.5 annual mean, 2023 · WHO guideline is 5
- Safely managed drinking water
- 31%of the population, 2024 · WHO/UNICEF JMP
- Healthcare capacity
- 0.3 doctors /1k0.4 hospital beds per 1,000
- Malaria
- 18 /1k at riskWHO, 2024 · listed for endemic countries only
Natural hazards in Afghanistan
- Earthquake
- 8.7/10EU INFORM, 2026 · higher = riskier
- Drought
- 8.7/10EU INFORM, 2026 · higher = riskier
- Flood
- 7.3/10EU INFORM, 2026 · higher = riskier
Hazard types scoring under 1 out of 10 are not listed. These describe Afghanistan as a whole, not Girishk specifically.
Same-sex sexual activity is criminalized in Afghanistan, with the death penalty applying in law (as of 2025). This describes the law on the books, not necessarily enforcement practice.
All country-level figures shared by every city in Afghanistan; none of them affect the safety score.
How the score works
One fixed, calibrated mix for every city: 40% homicide · 25% peace · 25% equality · 10% HDI. Homicide and conflict deaths are measured outcomes; income inequality carries the structural share because it predicts real city violence far better than national income (which is shown above but scored at zero). Each factor maps to 0-100 against fixed anchors, missing data drops out and is never estimated, and cities with data behind less than half the weighting get “no data” instead of a score. For Girishk that gives 57.2/100. Full methodology, anchors and sources →
Girishk compared with Kandahar
| Measure | Girishk | Kandahar | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety score | 57.2 | 50.4 | +6.8 — better for Girishk |
| Homicide ratecity-measured where published, otherwise the national rate | 4.2 /100k | 4.2 /100k | ±0.0 /100k |
| Conflict deaths within 100 km | 7 | 52 | −45 — better for Girishk |
Differences are plain arithmetic between the two stored figures — nothing is modelled. Both cities are in Afghanistan, so they share every country-level figure and only the city-level ones are listed. Full report for Kandahar →
Nearby cities
- Lashkar Gah 58.9
- Kandahar 50.4
- Nao Deh 49.4
- Tarinkot 53.0
- Chaman, Pakistan 53.1
- Farah 58.9
- Shindand 56.4
- Quetta, Pakistan 50.8
See Girishk on the interactive map → · Safest cities in Asia → · Full travel briefings →