Is Copiapó safe?
Chile · South America · data updated 2026-09-04
Copiapó is a city in Chile, home to about 174k people, and one of 6,168 cities worldwide ranked on this site from published safety data. It currently ranks 4,272 of 6,168, with a safety score of 62.0 out of 100, placing it clearly above the global midpoint.
Emergency Ambulance 131 · Fire 132 · Police 133
- Elevated homicide rate6.11 homicides per 100,000 per year (national rate), about 2× the global city median.
No official source names specific areas to avoid here: travel advisories for Chile are country-level, and no published dataset covers neighborhood-level crime - so this briefing does not invent it.
How safe is Copiapó really?
No published homicide figure exists for Copiapó itself, so the national rate stands in: Chile recorded 6.1 homicides per 100,000 people in 2024 - roughly 2 times the global city median. The city itself may be safer or more dangerous than its country's average. Chile's income inequality is middling (Gini 43.0) - in this dataset inequality predicts city violence better than any other structural factor, so this neither raises nor lowers the picture much.
What the travel advisories say
The US State Department currently rates Chile at level 2 of 4 - "Exercise increased caution" (updated 2026-05-19). The UK Foreign Office publishes travel advice for Chile without any avoid-travel warning in force. Both advisories are country-level: no official source publishes verified neighborhood-level crime guidance for individual cities, which is why this page reports named areas only where an official source names them.
What to watch out for in Chile
Terrorism in Chile · Political situation · Taxi scams at Santiago Airport · Protecting your belongings · Violent theft (muggings) · Vehicle crime · Drink spiking · Personal ID · Alcohol laws and bans · Illegal drugs and prison sentences · LGBT+ travellers · Fires in national parks · Hiking and mountaineering · Road travel · +6 more
Topic headings from the official UK FCDO travel advice for Chile — country-level, not specific to Copiapó. Read what each one says →
The numbers
- Homicide rate
- 6.1 /100knational rate, 2024 · ~2× the global city median
- Conflict deaths
- 0within 100 km, 2022-2024 (UCDP)
- Income inequality
- Gini 43.0country, 2024
- Human development
- HDI 0.878country, 2023
- Income
- $35,730/yrGNI per capita PPP · context only, not scored
- Population
- 174kurban centre · 6,979/km²
Country context for travelers
- Road deaths
- 14.9 /100kWHO, 2019 · often the biggest real travel risk
- Political stability
- 68/100World Bank WGI, 2024 · higher = more stable
- Rule of law
- 69/100World Bank WGI, 2024 · police and courts reliability
- Corruption perceptions
- 63/100Transparency International, 2025 · higher = cleaner
- Natural-hazard risk
- 3.1/10EU INFORM, 2026 · higher = riskier
- Women, Peace & Security
- 0.74Georgetown WPS Index, 2025 · 0-1, higher = better
- Air quality
- 23.1 µg/m³PM2.5 annual mean, 2023 · WHO guideline is 5
- Safely managed drinking water
- 98%of the population, 2024 · WHO/UNICEF JMP
- Healthcare capacity
- 3.3 doctors /1k1.9 hospital beds per 1,000
Natural hazards in Chile
- Earthquake
- 9.6/10EU INFORM, 2026 · higher = riskier
- Tsunami
- 8.6/10EU INFORM, 2026 · higher = riskier
- Flood
- 5.5/10EU INFORM, 2026 · higher = riskier
Hazard types scoring under 1 out of 10 are not listed. These describe Chile as a whole, not Copiapó specifically.
Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Chile (as of 2025).
All country-level figures shared by every city in Chile; none of them affect the safety score.
How the score works
One fixed, calibrated mix for every city: 40% homicide · 25% peace · 25% equality · 10% HDI. Homicide and conflict deaths are measured outcomes; income inequality carries the structural share because it predicts real city violence far better than national income (which is shown above but scored at zero). Each factor maps to 0-100 against fixed anchors, missing data drops out and is never estimated, and cities with data behind less than half the weighting get “no data” instead of a score. For Copiapó that gives 62.0/100. Full methodology, anchors and sources →
Copiapó compared with San Miguel de Tucumán
| Measure | Copiapó | San Miguel de Tucumán | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety score | 62.0 | 60.8 | +1.2 — better for Copiapó |
| Homicide ratecity-measured where published, otherwise the national rate | 6.1 /100k | 7.5 /100k | −1.4 /100k — better for Copiapó |
| Conflict deaths within 100 km | 0 | 0 | ±0 |
| Income inequality (Gini) | 43.0 | 42.4 | +0.6 — better for San Miguel de Tucumán |
| Human development (HDI) | 0.878 | 0.865 | +0.013 — better for Copiapó |
| Road deaths | 14.9 /100k | 14.1 /100k | +0.8 /100k — better for San Miguel de Tucumán |
| Rule of law | 69/100 | 53/100 | +16/100 — better for Copiapó |
| Corruption perceptions | 63/100 | 36/100 | +27/100 — better for Copiapó |
| Air quality (PM2.5) | 23.1 µg/m³ | 14.3 µg/m³ | +8.8 µg/m³ — better for San Miguel de Tucumán |
| Natural-hazard risk | 3.1/10 | 3.9/10 | −0.8/10 — better for Copiapó |
Differences are plain arithmetic between the two stored figures — nothing is modelled. Country-level rows describe the two countries, not the cities themselves. Full report for San Miguel de Tucumán →
Nearby cities
- La Serena 63.7
- La Rioja, Argentina 65.3
- Antofagasta 59.9
- San Fernando del Valle de Catamarca, Argentina 65.3
- San Juan, Argentina 65.3
- San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina 60.8
- Calama 62.0
- Salta, Argentina 70.4
See Copiapó on the interactive map → · Safest cities in South America → · Full travel briefings →